Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts

Sunday, January 30, 2011


It began with Saddam, say Iraqis Sunday,
30 January 2011 02:37
-thepeninsulaqatar--


BAGHDAD: Iraqis yesterday welcomed the revolt in Egypt that threatens to topple President Hosni Mubarak, with some claiming the tremors shaking Arab rulers had begun with the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

“Saddam was their teacher, and all of these dictators are his little pupils,” declared Hussein Mohammed, taking a break from loading boxes of imported toys into a truck.

“The dictator (Mubarak) must leave — all dictators must go,” the 55-year-old added, noting that he stayed up until 4.00am listening to the radio for news from Cairo.

“From Morocco to Saudi Arabia, we Arabs want all dictators out.”

Other Iraqis remained glued to their television sets throughout the day, with electronics store owner Maher Minjal tuning four televisions to different Arabic news channels reporting events in Egypt.

“The fuse was lit by Iraq, because we became the first Arab country to achieve democracy and get an elected government,” said Minjal, 28, from his store in Baghdad’s commercial Karrada district.

“If the regime in Egypt falls, all other Arab regimes will fall, because Egypt is the biggest and most powerful country in the Arab world.” Anti-regime riots that raged yesterday for a fifth straight day in Egypt, inspired by the overthrow of Tunisian strongman Zine El Abidine Ben Ali earlier this month, have sent shockwaves across the region.

At least one Iraqi political analyst agreed with the assessment that Iraq had begun a process that seemed to be spreading across the Middle East.

“It is absolutely true that (former US president George W) Bush was right when he said that democracy in Iraq would sweep through the Arab world,” Baghdad-based analyst Ihsan
Al Shammari said.

“In fact, Iraq was the first democratic regime in the region, but we are different from Egypt and Tunisia in that we were changed by foreign forces (the US-led coalition) and they are being changed by popular uprisings.

Iraq’s Al Mashriq newspaper pejoratively referred to Mubarak as a “Pharaoh,” and said the day of reckoning had come for a leader who had been a friend to the enemies of Arabs, which it said were Israel and the United States. “The American ally and the friend of Israel has been ruling Egypt since 1981, but the ground is shaking beneath the feet of the Pharaoh,” the Arabic-language newspaper said in an editoria. AFP

Monday, April 12, 2010


Terrorists from Dixie

A topical discussion on the American Civil War and the modern day notion of terrorism, By Roland S. Martin, CNN Political Analyst titled "Were Confederate soldiers terrorists?" April 11, 2010 9:35 a.m. ..for complete article(click)..


When you make the argument that the South was angry with the North for "invading" its "homeland," Osama bin Laden has said the same about U.S. soldiers being on Arab soil. He has objected to our bases in Saudi Arabia, and that's one of the reasons he has launched his jihad against us. Is there really that much of a difference between him and the Confederates? Same language; same cause; same effect.

If a Confederate soldier was merely doing his job in defending his homeland, honor and heritage, what are we to say about young Muslim radicals who say the exact same thing as their rationale for strapping bombs on their bodies and blowing up cafes and buildings?

If the Sons of Confederate Veterans use as a talking point the vicious manner in which people in the South were treated by the North, doesn't that sound exactly like the Taliban saying they want to kill Americans for the slaughter of innocent people in Afghanistan?

Defenders of the Confederacy say that innocent people were killed in the Civil War; hasn't the same argument been presented by Muslim radicals in Iraq, Afghanistan and other places where the U.S. has tangled with terrorists?

We can't on the one hand justify the actions of Confederates as being their duty as valiant men of the South, and then condemn the Muslim extremists who want to see Americans die a brutal death. These men are held up as honorable by their brethren, so why do Americans see them as different from our homegrown terrorists? (cont.)

Monday, March 8, 2010

Saturday, November 7, 2009





Why Ugandans want to work in Iraq

By Joshua Mmali
BBC News, Kampala


At the Watertight security training ground in Uganda, a group of men and women are doing target practice with their AK47s.
Nearby, another group are listening to a lecture under the shelter of a tree. Watertight Security Services has been sending Ugandan security guards to Iraq since 2007. So far, more than 10,000 Ugandans have gone to work in the country. Moses Matsiko worked in Iraq for more than three years before returning to Uganda to set up the company. "Since we do security, we start by screening the criminal background of people, hand in hand with Interpol," he told the BBC World Service.
"Then we do a medical screening to make sure that the people we are sending are medically fit. From there we start a training programme which entails weapon handling, shooting range drills and first aid." Applicants outnumber available places by more than 1,000.

Land of opportunity

Seth Katerema Mwesigye, an instructor at Watertight, says the money has made him wealthy by Ugandan standards.
"I was a student at Makerere university, but when I left, I did not have land. When I came back, I bought land and cows. All that money came from Iraq." Mr Masiko says that Iraq has proved to be a lucrative opportunity for security firms and their Ugandan recruits. But he says the company now needs to stay ahead of the increasing competition in the security sector and look for opportunities in new places. "More companies are coming in and they are ready to recruit for much less than we are offering which is $700 or $1,000 (£600) per month," he says. "Also you realise that other countries are coming into the market on the other side. "Originally Kenyans were not doing security work but today, there are more than 500 of them in Iraq and they work for as little as $400 per month. "So we are facing competition.

"But all eyes are now on Afghanistan. We hope that as it opens we are going to get more business there," he says.
But the picture is not all rosy. As well as the obvious danger of going to Iraq, there have been numerous stories recently in the Ugandan media about disaffected workers with complaints about conditions and pay. Some of them want to return home. Labour, Gender and Social Affairs Minister Gabriel Opiyo admits that not all of these companies have been treating their workers fairly.

"They must conform to the regulations which they signed up to when they got their licence, otherwise we will withdraw their licence," he says. "We are in the process of developing employment policies which will include a minimum wage."
It is obvious that the recruits at Watertight Security Services are desperate to escape from the poverty and unemployment that define their lives in Uganda. With hope, soon they will be marching into a future that will bring them rich rewards.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8341003.stm

Published: 2009/11/06 00:35:31 GMT

© BBC MMIX

Tuesday, November 3, 2009







List of noted U.S. involvement in regime changes of foreign nations courtesy of - wiki -


Iran 1953
Guatemala 1954
Cuba 1959-
Turkey 1960
Democratic Republic of the Congo 1960
Iraq 1963
Brazil 1964
Iraq 1968
Chile 1973
Afghanistan 1973-74
Argentina 1976
Afghanistan 1978-1980s
Iran 1980
Turkey 1980
Nicaragua 1981-1990
Republic of Ghana
Iraq 1992-1995
Guatemala 1993
Zimbabwe 2000s
Serbia 2000
Venezuela 2002
Georgia, 2003
Ukraine, 2004
Equatorial Guinea 2004
Lebanon 2005
Palestinian Authority, 2006-Present
Somalia 2006-2007
Venezuela 2007
Iran 2001-present